| 1 |
The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English:A corpus-based metapragmatic approach
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English: a corpus-based metapragmatic approach
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
The metapragmatics of consideration in (Australian and New Zealand) English
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
“The apology seemed (in)sincere”: Variability in perceptions of (im)politeness
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Indexical and sequential properties of criticisms in initial interactions: implications for examining (Im) politeness across cultures
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Modulating troubles affiliating in initial interactions the role of remedial accounts
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Conversational lapses and laughter: towards a combinatorial approach to building collections in conversation analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
The interactional achievement of speaker meaning: Toward a formal account of conversational inference
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Divided by a common language? Jocular quips and (non-)affiliative responses in initial interactions among American and Australian speakers of English
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Malefactive uses of giving/receiving expressions: the case of te-kureru in Japanese
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Accusations and interpersonal conflict in televised multi-party interactions amongst speakers of (Argentinian and Peninsular) Spanish
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
The interactional achievement of speaker meaning: toward a formal account of conversational inference
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Dominant accounts of "speaker meaning" in post-Gricean contextualist pragmatics tend to focus on single utterances, making the theoretical assumption that the object of pragmatic analysis is restricted to cases where speakers and hearers agree on utterance meanings, leaving instances of misunderstandings out of their scope. However, we know that divergences in understandings between interlocutors do often arise, and that when they do, speakers can engage in a local process of meaning negotiation. In this paper, we take insights from interactional pragmatics to offer an empirically informed view on speaker meaning that incorporates both speakers' and hearers' perspectives, alongside a formalization of how to model speaker meanings in such a way that we can account for both understandings - the canonical cases - and misunderstandings, but critically, also the process of interactionally negotiating meanings between interlocutors. We highlight that utterance-level theories of meaning provide only a partial representation of speaker meaning as it is understood in interaction, and show that inferences about a given utterance at any given time are formally connected to prior and future inferences of participants. Our proposed model thus provides a more fine-grained account of how speakers converge on speaker meanings in real time, showing how such meanings are often subject to a joint endeavor of complex inferential work.
|
|
Keyword:
1203 Language and Linguistics; 3310 Linguistics and Language; 3315 Communication; Implicature; Intentions; Negotiation
|
|
URL: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:793e7b2
https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:793e7b2/UQ793e7b2_OA.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
